Introduction:
The second season of Made In Heaven has been stirring up controversy among Indian viewers since its release. From allegations of promoting adultery to accusations of poor representation of the LGBTQ+ community, the Amazon Prime show has been criticized by many. However, the latest critique comes from fashion designer Tarun Tahiliani, who took to Instagram to express his disappointment with the show’s costume design.
Tahiliani’s Critique:
In a series of Instagram stories, Tarun Tahiliani slammed the makers of Made In Heaven Season 2 for their portrayal of fashion in the show. Tahiliani, who has been in the industry for over three decades and has dressed some of India’s biggest celebrities, labeled the outfits worn by the characters in the show as “hideous” and “tacky.” He expressed disappointment that the show failed to capture the elegance and sophistication that fashion represents.
Fashion and Culture:
In Indian culture, fashion has always been an integral part of celebrations and milestones. We have a rich history of textiles and embroidery, with countless regional variations that showcase our cultural diversity. Fashion designers like Tahiliani have played a significant role in catapulting India onto the international fashion stage. Therefore it’s no surprise that he feels strongly about fashion being misrepresented in the media and entertainment industry.
Costume Design and Storytelling:
Tahiliani’s critique points out the importance of costume design in storytelling. The clothes worn by characters in a show add to their personality and help evoke emotions among viewers. Therefore, costume designers have to be meticulous in their approach to design, ensuring that the garments they create align with the characters’ personalities and the narrative’s tone. In the case of Made In Heaven Season 2, Tahiliani feels the clothing choices do not reflect the characters’ personalities or the storyline’s tone.
Authenticity and Representation:
Another aspect of Tahiliani’s critique is the authenticity and representation of fashion in Indian media. Many films and TV shows often rely on outdated stereotypes and caricatures when depicting Indian fashion and culture. This misrepresentation does a disservice to the industry and sends the wrong message about the country’s fashion sense and cultural heritage. As a prominent figure in the fashion industry, Tahiliani’s critique is also a call for more authentic and accurate representation of Indian fashion in the media.
Positive Impact of Critique:
Finally, it’s worth noting that Tahiliani’s critique isn’t an attack on the show or the makers. It’s an observation and a critique that highlights what could have been improved. Critique can be a powerful tool for growth and improvement. It allows creators to understand how their work is being perceived by the audience and make necessary changes to improve future output. Therefore, instead of viewing Tahiliani’s critique as negative, it should be seen as constructive feedback that can lead to more significant and better representations of fashion in the media.
Conclusion:
Fashion designer Tarun Tahiliani’s critique of Made In Heaven Season 2’s costume design is a reminder of the importance of accurate and authentic representation of fashion in Indian media. By critiquing the clothing choices in the show, Tahiliani highlights the role that costume design plays in storytelling and the need for more accurate representations of fashion in the industry. Additionally, his critique is an example of how criticism can be used as a tool for growth and improvement. It opens up a conversation and dialogue that can lead to better representation and more significant strides in the industry.
English